California: The Weakest Link
Well, isn't this a surprise?
Surprise, surprise, an unelected activist judge from Kahleeforniyah has legislated from the bench.
Oh, and by the way, the state's historical definition is all that's needed to deny gay and lesbian couples "equal protection". Women do not have the right to marry women, men do not have the right to marry men. Is that "right" written into the California constitution? I bet it isn't!
SAN FRANCISCO — In a win for gay rights activists, a judge in California ruled Monday that marriage cannot constitutionally be limited to a legal union between a man and a woman.
If upheld on appeal, Monday's ruling by San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer would pave the way for the Golden State to follow Massachusetts in allowing same-sex couples to wed.
The judge wrote that the state's historical definition of marriage alone cannot justify not providing equal protection to gay and lesbian couples and their right to marry.
Surprise, surprise, an unelected activist judge from Kahleeforniyah has legislated from the bench.
Oh, and by the way, the state's historical definition is all that's needed to deny gay and lesbian couples "equal protection". Women do not have the right to marry women, men do not have the right to marry men. Is that "right" written into the California constitution? I bet it isn't!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home