31 March 2005

Smackdown

I have no idea why, but I've just completely lost any energy. I'm going to go home and take a nap, so expect some news coverage tonight. In the meantime, go check out Tech Central Station's coverage of Zimbabwe, or if you're in the mood for something funny, put on a diaper and read this.

BBC World Travesty

During my first senior year of university, I made it a habit to listen to the BBC World Service when I was in the computer lab. Once I discovered that I could listen to the Michael Medved show, either live or looped from the most recent show, I started listening to him more often than I listened to the BBC.

Today, for the hell of it, I decided to tune into the BBC World Service. It was less than five minutes before I eliminated it and switched to Medved. The overwhelming media bias on the BBC was pretty blatant. Despite evidence that the Iraqi weapons were lifted and moved elsewhere during the several months leading up to the war (you know, when we were trying to wrangle through the French diplomatic kabal in the United States?); despite the fact that there wasn't a single intelligence agency in the world that didn't believe that Iraq had the weapons; despite the fact that the diplomacy and the invasion were both led by the United States and Great Britain... Despite all of those things the Iraqi weapons were "non-existent" and they had some blowhard on there claiming that the intelligence was completely engineered by George Tenet to justify a policy that President Bush had already decided on.

Now I get to listen to Michael Medved disagreeing with me on the Schiavo issue. At least he's honest about it.

Fly News Alert

Terri Schiavo has died.

A Startling Revelation

I don't know if any of you folks watches Alias. I could have sworn that Marshall, the technical guy, was a midget. Turns out he's five feet, eight inches tall. I'm astonished.

On the other hand, they just had a hilarious scene where he was digging a guy's eyes out of his sockets so that they could use them with a retinal scanner.

The Dad Guy: "You're going to need some kind of digging instrument."
Marshall: "Uh... " *searches frantically* "I've got a spork!"
The Dad Guy: "What's a spork?"
Marshall: "It's a kind of half spoon, half fork?"
The Dad Guy: "That'll work!"

Digging out a terrorist's eye with a spork. Wow.

Plutonium to Pluto

This article is somewhat interesting. Apparently they're planning a space mission to Pluto. Since there's not enough sunlight that far out to power a solar-powered spacecraft, they're going to do what they did with the Pioneers, the Voyagers, and a number of other spacecraft: they're going to give it a mini nuclear reactor.

This is, of course, a very common sense approach to space exploration, which is why there must be about thirty metric tonnes of red tape, and a touchy feely public concerns search on the subject. If they'd only watch Star Trek, they'd be able to relax and just launch the damn thing.

Gun Runners

This story is almost too funny for words. Apparently Bulgarians are exporting modified gas spraying guns that have been reconfigured to fire bullets to Western European nations. This once again proves that when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

Supplying the Commies

Oh, good, Spain's supplying weapons to Venezuela. Wait... That's a bad thing?

Only Crashed Once

India is buying some used warplanes from Qatar. What's the catch? They're French.

India's defence ministry has been authorised by the cabinet to buy 12 used French-built Mirage 2000 jet fighters from Qatar.

It is part of a massive defence purchase package worth more than $700m.

The move comes days after the US announced it was going ahead with sales of its F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan, despite opposition from India.

Washington has also offered advanced combat planes to India, an offer that Delhi is considering.

Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee said his ministry was yet to negotiate the price of the Mirage jets.

He said the cabinet had also authorised a number of other military purchases.

Now, don't get me wrong here. To the best of my understanding, Mirage warplanes are very good equipment; the "never been fired, only [crashed] once" thing is just a joke. Why would the French crash something that hadn't even come close to seeing combat?

What I'd be especially concerned about, though, is buying second-hand aircraft from Qatar. Now, don't get me wrong, I like Qatar, at least on paper; I know very little about that country, save for the fact that they invited the Americans to establish a strong military presence there, and we enjoy good relations with the Qataris.

The thing I'm worried about is that I've heard real horror stories about the way that the military personnel of the Gulf states operate and maintain their equipment. It's been said that a major factor in the overwhelming defeat of Iraqi tanks by American tanks in 1991 wasn't so much the superiority of the M1-A1 Abrams MBT, but the poor training, doctrine, and particularly maintenance of the Iraqis and their tanks. Without going into specifics, I've spoken with veterans of Gulf War I who said that the Arab personnel they worked with didn't have the first clue what they were doing.

If I were the Indian defense minister, I'd pass on the used Qatari aircraft and wait for the deal with the Americans to pan out. There's no doubt in anyone's mind that we'd give them outstanding gear; just ask everyone else who flies either the F-15 Eagle, the F-16 Falcon, or even the F-4 Phantom.

Invitation Rescinded

Apparently the Kyrgyz people don't want their ousted president to come back. Go figure.

Media Showboatin' Mullahs

What do you do if you're a terrorist regime trying to convince the world that your program to build nuclear weapons isn't a program to build nuclear weapons? You give the media a limited tour of one of your facilities.

Journalists have been allowed to accompany Iranian President Mohammad Khatami on his first official visit to the Natanz nuclear facility.

Natanz, some 250km (150 miles) south of Tehran, was a closely-guarded secret until late 2002 when its existence was revealed by an Iranian exile group.

You'd think that this would have been a great opportunity for the IAEA to see those centrifuges, but no, Khatami couldn't have that.

And the media bias money shot?

The site holds uranium enrichment facilities which, the US says, could be aimed at producing nuclear weapons.

But Tehran insists its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes.

The U.S. says? Well, if it's just an eivl American Yankee cowboy imperialist accusation, then why are the Brits, the French, and the Germans teaming up to try and stop it?

Where's the Fly?

Between 15:00 and 15:50 PST, I was handling/learning how to disassemble an M16A2 assault rifle. Suh-weet. One of these days I'll find an excuse for someone to snap a picture of me in my British utilities so you wankers can see what they look like.

Right now I'm at work, and I have a story due in less than six hours for the independent campus newspaper. I'm going to write it on recent developments in foreign policy with relation to China. I'll probably post it here, as I've done with several of my other stories.

Anyay, here's the story. I've started writing up a lengthy response to Lee's long post from last night, but I'm not happy with it at this point. Tomorrow, when I have more time and I'm at a better computer, I can put some real time and thought into it. I think this will have two benefits. First, instead of having to quote Lee's original post, my reply will be more of an essay; this should make it more internally coherent. Second, it should be shorter.

I'll just say this up front, and it won't surprise anyone: I don't completely disagree with some of the things Lee has to say; that having been said, I think he's blown a lot of it out of proportion. Some of what he's had to say is just plain nonsense, and some of it's hypocritical nonsense. Even so, Lee's brought up some points that are worth addressing on their own in stand-alone posts, so in the next week I'll be writing a couple of individual essays to give my two cents on some of these issues.

Right now, though, I'm going to do a once-over of the news, since I haven't had a chance to do so since Monday. If I find anything good, I'll post it.

30 March 2005

Think Before Speaking

So as many of you know, I am heavily involved in college radio on campus. My primary show is Tuesdays from 22:00 to 24:00. As I'm driving home every Tuesday night, I tune in to the Jerry Doyle Show, as Tuesday is generally the only weeknight when I'm up late enough to listen.

So last night Jerry was on his usual rampage. I don't tend to completely agree with a lot of the points that he makes, but I don't totally disagree either. Last night, though, he was out in left friggin' field. He pointed out that on Monday:

  • Secretary Rumsfeld held a press conference at the Pentagon.
  • The First Lady announced that she would travel to Afghanistan.
  • President Bush held a press event with Iraqi voters at the White House.

    What did Jerry have to say about this? He pretty much said that these three events were attempts by the Bush Administration to draw attention away from Terri Schiavo, who's languishing and dying down in Florida. Well Jerry, if you're reading this, I'd like to point out several things.

  • The news media is still covering Terri Schiavo as a top story, and has been for weeks.
  • Other things happen in America and the world at large beyond the legal disputes of one family over one person.
  • The Bush Administration has made continuous statements encouraging an outcome in the Terri Schiavo case that would continue her nourishment.

    Now, believe whatever you want about the Terri Schiavo case, but hear me now and believe me later: the government carrying on with its business, and the news media covering it, is not some conspiracy against Terri Schiavo. Terri Schiavo is one person, and the world does not revolve around her; the fact that the news media can't go thirty seconds without someone saying the name "Schiavo" is the travesty here, not the President, First Lady, and Secretary of Defense holding press conferences.

    Welcome to the real world, Jerry.
  • First Week Back

    You regulars will know that this is my first week back to school for my last term at university. Since it's the first week, I'm basically running around like a chicken with its head cut off trying to get everything squared away so that my last term will be smoother than my penultimate term.

    Posting will be a bit light today, but when I have the opportunity I'll probably write an in-depth, but not point-by-point, response of what Lee had to say in his long post last night. Then I'm (hopefully) going to let it drop, because I have better things to write about than another blogger's anger.

    The Fly on Lee

    The first blog that I ever started reading was Right Thinking, which is a political/personal blog run by a guy named Lee, formerly of San Francisco, currently living in Los Angeles. Today Lee posted the following message.

    I Quit

    I can’t handle spending all day arguing with people whose opinions I used to respect. It’s quite obvious that there is no room in the conservative movement for someone like me. I’ve blogged in suport of the rights of the religious in America countless times, and over the past few weeks I’ve seen just how much respect those very same religious people have for me, my opinions, and the rule of law.

    Fuck all of you.

    He then posted a quote from a 1975 interview with Ronald Reagan. If you want to read it, you can go do it for yourself. Lee's site is about him, and this site is about me; if you're reading this, you want to read my opinion.

    I'm going to say it flat out: the quality of Lee's work has been slipping. When I started reading his stuff during the summer of 2003, it was really pretty brilliant. It continued to be brilliant for a long time. Every now and again, he'll post something that I'll absolutely agree with; even when I disagree, I usually appreciate his opinion. I've been able to say that less and less lately.

    Lee claims that he's blogged in support of the rights of the religious in America countless times. Lately, though, he's called the same religious folks ignorant as often as he possibly could. His attitude since December hasn't been respectful of religious Americans; the tone of his posts has seemed to say "Religious people have the right to be as ignorant as they want to be." Now, I can take a dig as well as the next guy, but this has been more than just a dig, and I'm not the only one who's gotten fed up with it. Lee has posted a number of E-Mails from people he claims to respect. These E-Mails have included some pretty objective and constructive criticism, and he has dismissed them all. Apparently he doesn't respect these people enough to listen when they tell him that he's losing touch.

    I will go on the record right now and say three things.

    First, many of the religious folks that Lee has been railing against have been infinitely more patient and tolerant than he. They've been more open-minded and more objective in their assessment of the debates and his posts and comments than he has been of theirs. At one point, he equated those skeptical of evolution with bratty children throwing a temper tantrum. I've gone out of my way to respect Lee's religious and scientific beliefs; he's made pretty much zero effot to afford me the same courtesy.

    Second, Lee's assertion that the majority of conservatives are fiscal and political conservatives and social moderates/progressives is wrong. Flat out wrong. The big news following the November election was that the family values crowd voted in droves, and they voted for President Bush because he's morally conservative and he has integrity. The conservative movement has room for people like Lee, but they must realize that they are the minority within conservative circles. When Lars Larson and Michael Medved (who is not Christian but Jewish) wholeheartedly disagree with Lee on the issue of Colorado's overturned capital punishment sentence, and can present far more coherent arguments on the subject, that means that Lee is in the minority, not those who disagree with him.

    Third, Lee opens his blog up for comments. He and Drumwaster share a failing: they can't admit when someone has gotten the best of them. I can't remember a single situation where Lee has acknowledged that his argument was weak, and decided to reconsider his position. Even if he didn't admit defeat, and instead came back with a stronger argument for his original position, I'd respect that. Instead, he's developed a tendency to present hypothetical situations that are, at best, tangentally related.

    It's no secret that Lee's been working himself too hard lately. I know he's had a lot of lousy things happen to him in the last year, and I sympathize with that. I have no clue whether or not that has anything to do with the decline in the quality of his work; it doesn't matter.

    I'm not going to get all squishy like all of those sissies did at Lee's site. If Lee quits blogging, I'll be disappointed, and I'll miss reading what he has to say. Unfortunately, I'm already disappointed, and I already miss reading what he has to say. If Lee quits now, it's won't be because he's tired of religious zealots; it will be because he just plain burned out; that would be a shame, but it would be the truth.

    Some people have said of the Terri Schiavo case that if President Bush, Jesse Jackson, and Ralph Nader all agree, that should say something. Lee appears to have been getting a lot of critical letters from people he claims to respect lately, and there have been corresponding comments to his posts. If I were in that position, I'd be moved to do some serious soul searching. Do I think that Lee should go to church, accept Christ as his personal Lord and savior, and renounce evolution? Yeah, that might be nice, but that's up to Lee. What I do think he should do is reconsider just how tolerant and progressive he really is.

    Lee, if you're reading this: take a holiday. You're making good money; take a week off and unwind. Whether you return to blogging or not, the way you're working and acting isn't healthy, and even if you don't care about that, it's sure as hell not going to make you happy. Take a break, mate. We're all worried about you...

    Even us ignorant religious zealots.

    Technical Difficulties

    Blogger swallowed that last post yesterday. Then, my computer froze up like Anna Nicole Smith at a spelling bee. Then, once I'd finished it, my computer spontaneously rebooted. It was the second time that's happened to me today. Not surprising with my computer, but the first time was in the lab, when I'd just finished my overdue final for my Islamic history course from last term.

    Maybe God wants me to shut up?

    When Fusion Causes Fission

    I'm going to try to reconstitute this post. Blogger swallowed it whole yesterday, and then my computer froze up like Anna Nicole Smith at a spelling bee.

    French President Jacques Chirac has told the Japanese people that he still welcomes their participation in the ITER project... If it's built in France.

    French President Jacques Chirac said Monday that the European Union hopes for an agreement soon to let Japan take part in a revolutionary nuclear project, despite a row over which country will host it.

    Talks have been deadlocked for months on where to build the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), with the European Union threatening to go alone if Japan does not drop its bid.

    "France along with Europe hope for Japan's participation as part of the international cooperation on ITER," Chirac said on a visit to Tokyo.

    "I have no doubt that an agreement on this issue can be found quickly between the European Union and Japan," he told a seminar on sustainable development organized by the Nikkei financial press group.

    How terribly diplomatic of the progressive, multilateral Europeans. And where do the other parties involved stand on the issue?

    The United States and South Korea support Japan's offer to build ITER in Rokkasho-mura, a northern Japanese village near the Pacific Ocean, while China and Russia back the EU bid for the southern French town of Cadarache.

    European Union leaders at a March 23 meeting in Brussels said they would go ahead with construction in Cadarache and gave Japan until July to agree.

    If I had to guess, I'd say that Japan's probably a better place to build the reactor. Not only do you have the benefit of the Japanese and South Korean industrial efficiency, but you have a far better economic environment in Asia than in Europe. The reactor isn't expected to be completed until 2050 as it is; do you honestly think that the French laborers are reliable enough to keep the ting on schedule, let alone finish it? Don't forget, folks, that since the calendar turned 2005, the following things have happened in France:

  • The French government passed legislation relaxing work week regulations to allow people to work more than thirty-five hours. The original legislation to limit the work week was aimed at boosting the French economy and creating jobs, but it has actually done the opposite. The French populace met this relaxation with widespread protests.
  • The International Olympic Committee visited Paris to evaluate it as a possible site for the 2012 Olympic games, and the Parisian labor unions went on strike.

    Many French folks also strike after every national holiday, just so they can have another day off. I encountered this in September of last year, when one day made the difference between whether or not I was able to go to the top of the Eiffel Tower.

    I don't know about the sites themselves; they could be comparable; but from a labor and economic standpoint alone, Japan is a much better site to build this reactor.

    And the other participants? The United States, to the best of my knowledge, doesn't have anything to gain by sticking it to France on this issue. The South Koreans could stand to profit due to their proximity to Japan; but my guess is that the amount they'd stand to profit from supporting one reactor isn't that much.

    What do the Chinese have to gain by supporting France as a candidate? Well, I seem to remember some stories in the news lately about the Chinese government lobbying to get a European Union weapons embargo lifted. The Chinese also have rather poor relations with the Japanese. Something about an invasion and occupation in the last century? I'm not really clear on the details. (Something about some lady named Nan King?)

    And Russia? Well, it doesn't surprise me that the Russians want cozy relations with the European Union, and we know that they already have good relations with the Chinese (who have bought a lot of their old military hardware). There's also the issue of the Russo-Japanese War, the centennial of which is this year. (For those of you who weren't around at the time, Japan pretty much owned Russia, no questions asked.)

    In the end, the French can always, in all cases, be relied upon to do one thing: whatever is best for France. I have to give President Chirac credit, though: physically travelling to Japan to tell them that they're welcome to participate if they do it the French way takes a big pair. Not as big as President Bush's, but big nontheless.

    In the end, this may effectively divide the ITER coalition. If that happens, who do you think will finish first, and whose reactor will actually work? If you said "France," you're not paying close enough attention.
  • 29 March 2005

    The Neighbor's House

    What do you folks think: is Lee actually quitting?

    Post your thoughts. I'll comment more later.

    UPDATE: I'm going to write up that post about Japan and France, and then make my statement about Lee so that it's at the top for any Right Thinkers who come on over.

    Eating Posts

    Okay, Blogger has eaten two of my posts in the last fourteen hours. My guess is that they're "fixing" it again. Later today I'll make a long post about France, Japan, and ITER that I tried to make yesterday.

    Big Government and Business

    Now that the European Union and Microsoft have agreed on a version of Windows that doesn't include Windows Media Player, do you really think that a black market for American software with the included media player isn't going to develop?

    It's overregulation like this that makes Europe a suicidal place to start a business.

    Diplomatic Taiwanese

    Well, isn't this interesting?

    Taiwan's main opposition party has begun its first visit to China since Communist forces defeated it and took power on the mainland in 1949.

    The 30-member team of the Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT) is being led by vice chairman Chiang Pink-kun.

    Mr Chiang said the visit was aimed at easing tensions with Beijing.

    China sees Taiwan as a breakaway province. Earlier this month, Beijing passed a law, allowing it use force to stop any Taiwanese independence moves.

    "We hope to help ease cross-strait tensions to ensure people's well-being," said Mr Chiang, on arrival. "[We hope] to do what the government does not do and cannot do."

    This could be a good move by the Taiwanese. You're sending over politicians, who are important. That can be seen as a conciliatory move to ease tensions with China. At the same time, it's not the government (meaning, in this case, the ruling party) who are involved in the visit, so there's no political legitimacy to it.

    The money shot comes in the little blurb to the side...

    TAIWAN-CHINA RELATIONS
  • Ruled by separate governments since end of Chinese civil war in 1949
  • China considers the island part of its territory
  • China has offered a "one country, two systems" solution, like Hong Kong
  • Most people in Taiwan support status quo

  • Gentle reader, the "one country, two systems" system is an absolute joke, and China has used it to cover up the fact that they're suppressing democracy in Hong Kong and Macau. There is no such thing as a mixing of Communism and Democracy. They are diametrically opposed. It seems necessary to quote from Tacitus...

    I have often heard him say that a single legion with a few auxiliaries could conquer and occupy Ireland, and that it would have a salutary effect on Britain for the Roman arms to be seen everywhere, and for freedom, so to speak, to be banished from its sight.
    - Agricola, ch. 24

    When a government exercises absolute control over the people, it is unacceptable for an example to exist within the very same nation of people who retain power and delegate it to elected leaders. The Chinese can't allow true democracy in Hong Kong, and haven't; anyone who believes that Taiwan would be any different is a fool.

    Marginalizing Terror

    Following up on this post, the BBC has an article about the reforms that the "Palestinian" Fatah party/movement needs to introduce if they want to continue their claim of political legitimacy.

    eBay Buyers, Beware

    Sweet merciful glaven, look at this!

    (Link via Free Will.)

    Blogger Constipation

    I think that Blogger has finally fixed itself. Wouldn't you know it, I vowed to drop Blogger if it didn't work by the end of Spring Break, it worked all of Spring Break, now it's stopping up again.

    I'll try to post a couple of bits of news now.

    28 March 2005

    Computer Lab Totties

    You know how I'm always posting about the Computer Lab Crazies? I think I'm going to start a new segment every now and again on Computer Lab Totties. For you Americans in the group (yes, I'm an American, I spell American, but I try to use British slang so Poosh and Wankerborn feel welcome), a "totty" is a rather attractive young lady.

    There's this girl who I used to always see here in the lab who I just saw walking out. Generally speaking, I'm attracted to white girls and Japanese girls, period. Every now and again there's an exception; it's not racism, it's just that those are the ethnicities I tend to check out. Anyway, if I had to guess, I'd say this girl is Indian or Pakistani. Long, black hair, dark olive skin tone, et cetera. She's rather short, and I see her either in the lab or on campus once or twice a week.

    Outstanding.

    Generation Fly

    When I was a junior in college, I took a lot of ancient history courses from my advisor, Professor Augustus. This meant a lot of eleventh hour study sessions with my mates in one of the conference rooms up in the department. Right before we quit studying every term (for both midterms and finals), I'd break out my laptop and load up the helicopter attack scene from Apocalypse Now.

    "Smell that? Do you smell that?"
    "What!?"
    "Napalm, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of napalm in the morning. You know, one time we had a hail bomb. For twelve hours, and when it was all over I walked up. We didn't find one of them, not one stinking dink body. And the smell, you know, that gasoline smell? Ohhhh hell! Smells like... Victory... Someday this war's gonna end."

    One term, probably either Winter or Spring of 2003, Professor Vertikov walked by the door to the conference room, looked in at us all gathered around the screen, and said "Oh, I guess you guys finally found the password to that Girls Gone Wild video." There wasn't a straight face in the room (save for Professor Vertikov, who walked off immediately after that).

    This morning after I got out of the shower, my television went on, and it was tuned to Comedy Central. What would I see but an infomercial for Girls Gone Wild? Now I don't have time to go off on a rant, here, but I think that Girls Gone Wild heralds a new low in the history of Western Civilization.

    Now, I'm certainly not a prude. I'm a twenty-two year old guy, which means that I'm genetically hotwired to love seeing naked young women. I even believe that nudity/pornography, in some cases, can be portrayed tastefully and beautifully. Girls Gone Wild doesn't do that. It reduces young women to absolute animals, and men too. I'm sure it's three parts alcohol, one part money, and one part fame that causes these young women to expose themselves and behave in such a way.

    To me, it's like a train wreck. It's painful to watch, but it's difficult to turn away... But now I am.

    Sunken Treasure

    Apparently they've located a well-preserved, large Japanese submarine (World War II era) near Hawaii.

    (Link via Colonel Spook.)

    Reflections, Old and New

    I've just been jumping through Amazon, looking at a couple of the books that I read when I was in elementary and middle school. Some of it was real rubbish, or at least, inappropriate for me to have read. Of course, this is all twenty-twenty hindsight; and to be honest, some of what I read when I was a kid was really good stuff. For example, I read a bunch of the Hardy Boys mysteries. That was excellent stuff.

    That's one of the things I look forward to doing once I've graduated from college: reading. As far as I can tell from my records (which you wankers can't see, or else you'd track me down like the crazed fans that you are, especially Harley!), I've read no more than thirty books in the last five years. Five years! That's six books a year! Scarcely one book every two months, and most of that in the Summer, and nine of them directly or indirectly read for school. That's nonsense, and though it's unfortunate to say, my real scholarship won't start until after school's done. I'm even looking forward to having time for research.

    I've also been reflecting on what went wrong in my relationship with the Mirror; I've got six more hours to reflect on it, then I'm done. I noted my conclusion last night, but failed to explain my nomenclature. I think that the Mirror developed a condition that I've come to refer to as PGS. What does "PGS" stand for, you ask? It's simple. Party Girl Syndrome.

    At the end of December, the Mirror moved up to London and took a job as a nanny for a family with two young boys. It's the first time she's lived away from home. I found out yesterday when I was on the phone with her that, since our breakup on 19th February, she's cropped off a lot of her hair, dyed some of it brown, but added bright red streaks to it. She's also pierced her nose; if there's one turn-off for this Super Fly, it's a pierced nose.

    I've seen PGS while I've been at university. A girl (or a guy) gets away from their parents for the first time, they have enough money to be comfortable, and relative freedom and autonomy. That's why you have eighteen year old girls getting tattoos. That's why you have eighteen year old girls getting piss steaming drunk and getting laid for the first time at some Pabst-saturated frat orgy.

    The Mirror's got a decent paycheck, twelve hours a day to herself (although eight of those are spent sleeping), weekends off, and near-total freedom from her folks. And me? I was six or seven thousand miles away. Thus, the Mirror developed a bad case of PGS.

    Was that the only reason for our breakup? Nope. There were a lot of reasons; and there were a lot of reasons why we should have given it another shot. Unfortunately, it's become very clear that she's not going to go for that. Yesterday she used that dreaded phrase that you hate to hear after you've made a last ditch investment in a dying romance: "This feels more and more like a friendship."

    It's all bollocks, folks; but tomorrow, it's a whole new ballgame. I've got eleven weeks until I hit the ground running.

    "'Cause what you leave behind, you don't miss anyway."

    27 March 2005

    Dedicated to Eyerocker

    This joke is dedicated to Eyerocker.

    An American man's job with a furniture company gave him occasion to travel to Paris on a buying expedition. As he was checking into his hotel, an attractive young French woman was checking in at the same time. She smiled at him; unfortunately, he spoke no French, and she spoke no English. In a fit of genius, he grabbed a pen and a piece of paper and drew a crude picture of two people walking in a public park. She smiled, and nodded, and the two of them took a walk through one of the many Parisian parks.

    As their legs were getting tired, the woman looked down, picked up a twig and scrawled another image in the dirt, a picture of two people riding in a carriage. The gentleman smiled and nodded, and the two of them took a ride through the city in a horse-drawn carriage.

    When their carriage ride ended, the man drew another picture, this time of the two figures having a romantic candlelit dinner at a little cafe. The woman nodded, and the two of them enjoyed a lovely French dinner, complete with a couple of bottles of fine French wine.

    By this time it was quite dark, and the two returned to the hotel. The woman smiled, kissed the man on the cheek, and took the paper and pencil once more. On the paper, she drew a picture of a beautiful four-post bed. To this day, the gentleman has no idea how she knew that he was in the furniture business.

    Interspecies Copulation

    I have to celebrate the Resurrection by going to brunch with my family. I'm not so stoked about it. While I'm a very devout Anglican, what could be better sacrilege to leave for you, my loyal readers, than a theoretical portrayal of what happens when an elephant makes love to a pig?

    Mud in China's Eye

    Gee, it appears that the Taiwanese people don't much care for China's "anti-secession" laws.

    TAIPEI, Taiwan — In one of the largest demonstrations in Taiwan's history, about a million people marched through the capital on Saturday to protest a new Chinese law that authorizes an attack on the island if it moves toward formal independence.

    "Taiwan is only a small island, so we must speak out really loud to make the world hear that we are a democracy facing an evil giant," said Vivian Wang, a 38-year-old restaurant worker who traveled by bus from the southern city of Kaohsiung — about 190 miles away.

    Keep in mind, folks, that the legitimate Chinese government has been in exile on the island of Formosa for more than half a century.

    Middle Eastern Peaceniks

    Well, it's good to see that Hamas has their eye on the prize.

    GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — A leader of Hamas on Sunday accused Israel of violating a recent cease-fire agreement, hinted the militant group is using the current period of calm to rearm itself and warned that tensions over Jerusalem could quickly spill over into violence.

    Hamas, which is expected to win a large share of seats in Palestinian parliamentary elections in July, also will oppose any peace agreement with Israel, said Mahmoud Zahar, one of the group's top figures in Gaza.

    In a statement published in the Al Quds daily, Zahar criticized Israel's announcement last week that it plans to expand Maaleh Adumim, a major settlement near Jerusalem.

    The planned construction would link the settlement to Jerusalem, separating Arab neighborhoods of the city from the rest of the West Bank. The Palestinians claim all the West Bank as part of a future independent state, with east Jerusalem as their capital.

    Let's hope that President Abbas steps up to the plate and smites Hamas over this.

    BBC Quick Update

    Here are a few more stories from the BBC.

    Israel and Chad (a Muslim nation) have established relations.

    The U.N. is waffling under Lebanese government pressure with regard to the investigation into last month's assassination of Rafik Hariri. There's a surprise.

    French President jacques Chirac is going to meet with Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. Chirac is expected to explain to Koizumi why he wants to lift the ban on selling high-tech weapons to Japan's neighbor and strategic rival, China, as well as explaining why Japan isn't good enough to host the ITER reactor.

    Those wacky Somali warlords are at it again.

    Diplomacy Now!

    What's the European Union's solution to all problems, even problems with violations of human rights? More diplomacy!

    Barbarism in Beirut

    Some savages have bombed Beirut's Christian district the day before we Christians celebrate the Resurrection.

    Animals.

    Chernobyl and... Pierre?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I wasn't aware that the Chernobyl disaster had much of an impact on France.

    A new expert report on the radioactive cloud from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster over France suggests radioactivity measurements were sometimes much higher than at first suggested, a source close to the case said Saturday.

    I'm not even sure what to make of this. France is what, a thousand, two thousand miles from Chernobyl? If I've got information saying that there wasn't much radiation over France after the Chernobyl explosion, I'm going to tend to believe it.

    Why am I not surprised that, when given good news, the French decide that it should have been worse?

    Mixed Signals

    Apparently the European Union can't decide what their position on lifting the arms embargo against China is.

    Counting Down

    Tomorrow is the anniversary of the Resurr... Scratch that. It's after midnight. Today is the anniversary of the Resurrection. It's the last day before I begin my last term of university. During the last term:

  • My grandfather was killed in an automobile accident
  • My longest relationship ever ended
  • I got no work done, save for this term's school work

    I've had rough terms before. This one drove me to the brink. This term made me wish that I was a drunk; it probably bodes well for me that I seem to have no desire to drink when I'm feeling lousy. At any rate, I'm ready for this term to be over. In less than twenty-four hours, it will be. Spring Break's almost over, and it's time for a change.

    Come midnight, Winter Term is gone. I've found peace over my grandfather's death. The Mirror appears to have contracted PGS*, and if sending roses from seven thousand miles away can't immediately convince her that we should give things another chance, then there's no use worrying about it: it's unequivocally and totally over, and it's time for me to move on.

    Perhaps it's appropriate timing. Today we celebrate our God rising from the dead after we screamed for His death. Now I'm forcing myself to wrench the remnants of my life away from the torment of the last three months. These are the last eleven weeks of what I've been told is the best part of my life. I have seventy pages of research to write, and I have to conclude my legacy at school.

    I have eleven weeks until I get dropped head first, kicking and screaming, into the real world that I've been told about for twenty-two years. I no longer have the luxury of mourning; it's time for me to tow the line between savage and civilized.

    "Is this rock and roll!?"
  • The Fly on Stargate

    Fair warning: this is the Fly bitching about nerd stuff, no more, no less.

    Okay. So last week after Galactica, I watched the first part of the season finale of Stargate SG-1. Last night, since I'd seen the first part, I decided to watch the second part. Hey, I was curious how it'd turn out, right?

    Seeing as how I have the film that started it all (yes, Stargate was a movie with Kurt Russell and James Spader before it was a television show with Richard Dean Anderson), I decided to watch it this afternoon instead of doing work. After I put the tape in, I read the blurb on the back of the box.

    When a mysterious woman makes Professor Daniel Jackson (James Spader) an offer he can't refuse, he ends up in a secret Air Force military base. His mission: to decode an ancient Egyptian artifact known as the Stargate.

    The mission leader, Colonel Jack O'Neil (Kurt Russell), a tough military man with nerves of steel, commandders their trip through the Stargate to an ancient civilization on the other side of the universe. But once there, they must battle the astoundingly powerful Sun God, Ra (Jaye Davidson), before they can find their way back home.


    Right then. Let's just break this down, shall we?

    First off, "secret Air Force military base" is redundant. If it's an Air Force base, it's a military base. They should have used one or another; probably the latter, as the fact that it's the Air Force has little to do with the actual storyline; it could easily be any of the other branches of the military, save for the fact that they're (for some unknown reason) in a missile silo. The point of the matter, though, is that "secret Air Force military base" is very poorly written.

    Second, the blurb says that Colonel Jack O'Neil "commandeers" their trip. Not "commands" or "leads." He commandeers it. Now, allow me to educate you wankers. To "commandeer" something is to take control of it and steer it in a direction it was not previously intended to go. No such thing happens in this film. The writer is just a moron who has no mastery of the English language... And yet they've got him writing cover blurbs for films that are printed, distributed, and sold to thousands of people.

    Anyway. Back to the film.

    26 March 2005

    SSC

    If you can decipher the title of this post, you're a genius.

    At any rate, this is one way to do it.

    Legal Revision

    Based on the television I've been watching today (as opposed to doing real work), I've revised my list of offenses that justify... Nay, necessitate, capital punishment. The new list:

  • Murder
  • Rape
  • Child molestation
  • Writing, producing, or directing the 2001 film Wet Hot American Summer

    Seriously, what garbage. If it weren't for the fact that there are two really hot girls in the cast, I totally wouldn't have watched for this long.
  • Fly on Galactica

    Okay, Galactica's starting to get good. Seriously. If you're not watching it, you're missing out; unless your name is Lycan, in which case you're probably getting some, and can be otherwise excused. (By the way, what happened to your site, mate? All your posts are gone!)

    Battlestar Galactica is pulling off all sorts of different things: politics, spirituality, romance, action... And it's pulling it all off with effective dialogue and realistic interpersonal relationships. Folks, this is some of the best drama I've seen in a long time on television, and it's some of the best science fiction I've seen in a long time, too. I tend to enjoy Enterprise; so far, Galactica has made Enterprise look like the ugly step-sister to Galactica's Cinderella.

    And they just pulled out an obscure reference to Greek philosophy. Holy sweet glaven.

    The one thing I'm worried about at this point is that some of the progress they're making, while helping to advance the storyline, seems to be getting them closer and closer to Earth (which, as far as I can tell, would mark the end of the series). President Roslin is supposed to live no longer than six months, and the scripture they're using says that she won't live to see their destination. I think it would be a shame to have such excellent science fiction on television, only to let it end after two seasons. As far as I'm concerned, I haven't seen original television Sci Fi this good since Space: Above and Beyond, which only ran for a single season even though it retains a major cult following.

    Sip, I'm telling you, man: it's worth the effort.

    The Falcons of Pakistan

    The big news in the national security arena this weekend is the approval by the Bush Administration to sell F-16 warplanes to Pakistan. India isn't happy about the situation, but the Bush Administration has also pledged to help make India a major world power in the twenty-first century.

    It has been suggested that the sale of F-16s to Pakistan could be a diplomatic move aimed at securing the use of Pakistani air space, facilities, et cetera, in a possible campaign against Iran over their nuclear program.

    I think this is basically an excellent outcome. The Pakistanis have shouldered a lot of the burden of fighting the War on Terror, particularly in Baluchistan and Waziristan where Usama bin Laden is believed to be in hiding. They're also border-to-border neighbors with Iran. The new Iraqi government would likely allow us to use their facilities and air space, but even if they did, there's a strategic and operational advantage to being able to come at your opponent from two sides. Also, there's a value in having support of more than just the Arabs; the ethnic diversity of Pakistanis from Arabs means that it's not just the same old Arab versus Persian conflict. It continues to put the mullahs in a tougher and tougher position, in spite of the molly coddling they're getting from the European diplomats.

    I also think that this strategic support for India is a good policy. India has a population that will likely exceed that of China within the next couple of decades, maybe sooner. They're also on the cutting edge of emerging technology, with more and more information systems having one thing or another to do with Indian labor or manufacturing as time goes on. India is a quiet up-and-comer on the international scene, and promoting their economy and military (vice that of the Chinese) is an excellent long-term American investment, in both political and economic capital.

    Having Pakistan's assistance in case of a campaign against Iran is important, but maintaining the fragile balance of power in the Indian sub-continent is crucial. This arrangement should be an excellent provision for that.

    Small Armed Mullahs

    I think I've already mentioned on here that the mullahs bought eight hundred Austrian sniper rifles a couple of months ago. According to various sources, the mullahs are amassing military equipment, including sniper rifles and night vision gear.

    Bishkek Blitz

    Remember all the hubbub in Kyrgyzstan the past couple of weeks? Well, they seem to have ousted their president, who was accused of having stolen the election (like Democrats tried to do in 2000 and 2004), and they've temporarily installed the opposition leader. That's right, folks, we have another Ukraine on our hands, except this time, they weren't quite so friendly.

    Kyrgyzstan's new leaders have taken steps to restore order after widespread looting in the capital, Bishkek.

    The city seemed tense but calmer as volunteer police patrolled the streets, with some clashes seen as evening fell.

    Former opposition member Kurmanbek Bakiev, named as acting president, appointed an interim cabinet and said fresh elections would be held in June.

    Meanwhile, deposed leader Askar Akayev accused the opposition of staging an "anti-constitutional coup".

    Russia has expressed concern over the events in Kyrgyzstan. It sounds like a very difficult situation, but given the choice between tyrants abusing democracy to retain power, or the people rising up violently to overthrow an illegitimate government, I'll take the latter. I'll keep y'all updated on this.

    A Question for Lycan

    Lycan, if you're reading this...

    Where in the name of all things glaven did your site go?

    Answering Harley: China

    I'm getting to think that answering Harley's questions may turn into a regular task here on Thus Saith The Fly; that's a good thing, though, because Harley asks good questions. Here's the latest:

    OK lets go a bit further, lets say that the US and China get into a shooting war over [Taiwan], you can expect the moonbats to do their thing.
    However, What a bout the T-bills that China has bought up? I know that Japan has more, but if China tries to sell them short,??? well crap I'm not to good at this Whole world macro economics. But they could defiantly put us in a Wringer.

    I hope you are right about the Average American knowing that China is areal threat.
    Maybe that will get some people more supportive of a missile defense system.

    I also wonder, IF the EU drops the Weapons sale ban on China, and some time down the line a US ship catches another Exeocet or French made missiles in its side.... what would the eventual reaction be?

    Now, I'll be the first to admit that my knowledge of international economics is lousy; mostly, it consists of knowing that the Chinese government is buying dollars like it's going out of style, knowing a little bit about why the dollar has taken a hit in the past couple of years, and having experience with changing money when I lived and travelled in Europe.

    I'm not real worried about China actually using a nuclear weapon against us, or even Taiwan. They want Taiwan intact; to the Chinese, nuking Taiwan would be about like President Bush giving the order to nuke Alaska. The missile defense system is less about the Chinese or Russians firing on us, and more about a rogue Russian general, terrorists, or (most likely) a rogue nation like North Korea.

    If another Exocet missile hit an American ship, I think the reaction would have a lot to do with how the president at the time phrased his remarks of reaction. A good president would give all of the facts: the American government attempted diplomatically to prevent E.U. nations from selling advanced weapons to China, but that those nations were not directly responsible for the hit. Of course, this is all based on an assumed shooting war with China over Taiwan; the best bet the Chinese have is to completely circumvent the United States in such an endeavour and try to pass it off as A) completely legal due to Taiwan's illegal status (which is absolute nonsense) and B) within their sphere of influence as a sovereign state (which is also absolute nonsense).

    If China attempted an invasion of Taiwan, it would be a very high profile situation, and the news media would give it a lot of coverage; it would probably be similar to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990. I think you'd have a much higher probability of overwhelming international support (like you had for Gulf War I, with the exception of Senator Kerry).

    And, as you pointed out, China has more to lose from a war with us than we have to lose from one with them.

    Rednecks and Dogs

    In order to retain my anonymity, I can't post a link to the story I'm going to lay out for you, but it's on the front page of my hometown newspaper; I'm not a subscriber, but they subscribe at the office and I had a look at the front page.

    The big front page article is of a little kid, less than two years old, with his face stitched up. And I mean really, really stitched up. The count is something like fifty-seven. The kid got attacked by a dog, and not just any dog: a unnamed pit bull mix who we'll call "Lenny" (my favorite character on the Simpsons) for the sake of convenience.

    Here are a few of the facts that are important to lay out before I make my own comments.

  • Lenny belongs to a family friend, and to kid and his brother have played with him before.
  • The kid was either leaning on or trying to hug Lenny.
  • Lenny's owner had just disciplined him for growling.

    The kid's dad apparently wants people to know that dogs that are known to lash out "are not good family pets." The mother emphasized the importance of keeping dogs like pit bulls on a leash. Ya think?

    The last paragraph of the story says that the family had intended to get a house at some point, and an accompanying puppy for the kids. Instead, they'll be getting a house without a dog.

    My take on the issue? Well, there are several things here that have to be considered.

    Some people make the statement that girls who dress provocatively are "just asking to get raped." They're immediately criticized for it by women's libbers, et cetera. Now, I'm not saying that any woman deserves to be raped, because that's obviously incorrect. On the other hand, people often use their attire to elicit a response from members of the opposite sex; for example, when the Fly wears his kilt, all the women immediately get flirty and want to know if I'm wearing it according to the true Scottish style (which is to say, sans underwear; the answer, of course, is "yes"). We say that "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," and that it's "better to be safe than sorry." If I were a woman, aside from being far too ugly for any guy to want to date, I'd dress at least somewhat modestly, and do whatever it took to stay safe from the sexual predators that I know to be roaming the streets and casing the bars and clubs of College City.

    I see this as a completely similar case. Should the kid have been attacked? Of course not. Was he "asking for it"? Of course not. Did it happen because the parents are a couple of negligent rednecks who don't have enough sense not to let their sons, aged four and not quite two years old, play with an angry pit bull? You better believe it.

    As for dogs, we got our first dog when I was less than two years old. He was a black labrador, and he was about the best dog a kid could have asked for. Again, without giving away my location, I can tell you for a fact that the area this family lives in is a perfect place for little boys to have a dog, and knowing the local yokels in that area of the county, it would probably be good for home security as well. It doesn't take that much consideration: don't let your toddler play with dogs like pit bulls, Rottweilers, or Dobermans.

    Then again, if they were stupid enough to let this happen in the first place, maybe they shouldn't get a dog; children are probably far more responsibility than they're ready for as it is.
  • 25 March 2005

    Good Friday

    In the garden, I was playing the tart
    I kissed your lips and broke your heart
    You, You were acting like it was the end of the world
    - Paul Hewson

    While he was still speaking a crowd came up, and the man who was called Judas, one of the Twelve, was leading them. He approached Jesus to kiss him, but Jesus asked him, “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?
    - The Gospel According to St. Luke


    Happy Good Friday, folks.

    Just a Thought

    Fox News is doing an update on Pope John Paul II, live from Rome. And where did they choose to do it? You guessed it: the Colosseum. Because, as we all know, the games had everything to do with the Pontiff.

    24 March 2005

    Fun with the U.N.S.C.

    Remember all the trouble in Sudan lately? Sarah sends the following article.

    UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - France is to put to a vote on Thursday a U.N. resolution referring Sudanese war crimes cases to the International Criminal Court, daring Washington to cast an embarrassing veto or accept a tribunal it opposes.

    After weeks of haggling on a comprehensive resolution on Sudan, the U.N. Security Council has been deadlocked on where to try perpetrators of atrocities in the country's western region of Darfur.

    On Wednesday, France's U.N. ambassador, Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, introduced a draft resolution that would refer Darfur cases to the ICC, the world's first permanent criminal court, as recommended by a U.N. panel of experts in January.

    But the United States offered to create a new U.N.-African Union tribunal in Tanzania that has drawn little support, with several council members arguing that only the ICC already has investigators on staff ready to begin work

    This one's tough. There is no doubt in my mind that the International Criminal Court has been set up in such a way as to allow foreign governments to hamstring American citizens with impugnity. We've seen this with attempts to try American troops and military leaders for war crimes.

    On the other hand, something needs to be done about Sudan. Seeing as how there was an international court used to try Slobodan Milosevic, I find it hard to believe that the ICC is the only available/appropriate venue for such war crimes trials. Hell, Nuremberg wasn't under the auspices of the United Nations, was it?

    I wouldn't be surprised at all to find that the French tabled this resolution for no greater reason than to put the United States in an awkward diplomatic position. It's more of the same from a government that desires to be a superpower, but can't come anywhere near pulling it off. The French did whatever they could to prevent the Coalition of the Willing from holding Saddam Hussein and his thugs accountable for their crimes against humanity, largely because there was all sorts of corruption going on between the French and the Iraqis. Then they sat on their hands for months while the Sudanese committed horrible acts of genocide against each other. Now they're twisting it around and playing politics with it?

    And they call America a nation of unsophisticated cowboys who shoot first and ask questions later. This is sickening.

    UPDATE: Harley has some comments that are worth addressing.

    Typical of the way the French are playing things.
    And africa.... well.. is Africa. BTW you see this over at Instapundit? and strategy page?

    http://www.strategypage.com/dls/...s/ 200532323.asp

    This will deter the Chinese, if they're rational.

    UPDATE: Jim Bennett emails: True. plus, the more foreign oil they import, the more vulnerable they would be to the US Navy cutting off their supplies. Worked wonders on Japan in WWII. Of course, they said all of this about Germany before WWI." Yes, that's the problem with the rational-actor assumption.

    Of course my take is China may hope that the US fearing instability in the US markets will stand by and do nothing. for fear that Us consumers would become up set if the US government impose sanctions against China which would result in a loss of products for consumers.
    in other words, What will Mr and Mrs Smith think when Wallmarts shelves go bare of the junk they buy everyday?
    And how will the government Justify expending American lives to protect Taiwan if that results in such situation?

    considering how the country was split in the last election......

    What do you think?


    This is a tough one. To be honest with you, I think that Americans as a whole probably have a better understanding of the threat China poses. All of the folks who were (rightfully) indoctrinated against Communism during the height of the Cold War still view the Chinese government for what it is: oppressive, and a strategic competitor to the United States.

    I think people also remember the 2001 incident with the Chinese and our EP-3 Aries surveillance plane. Incidents like that, which were high profile (read: big in the media), are more tangible to Mr. and Mrs. Smith than Iraq. People didn't know that Iraq was trying to hit American and British warplanes with surface-to-air missiles a couple of times a week (prior to the invasion). People didn't know that Saddam was giving twenty-five grand to the parents of every "Palestinian" suicide bomber.

    Plus, if you consider it in historical context, Americans supported military operations in Grenada and Panama; Grenada was specifically against Communist forces. I can guarantee you that most Americans had never even heard of Grenada before we invaded, so I think Taiwan would probably have a similar support. At least, I hope it would.

    It's a tough situation, because the Chinese have made it a tough situation.

    And yes, I've seen the information about the Charles de Gaulle. Submarine reactors on an aircraft carrier. That's just plain stupidity, but it's entertaining from the outside looking in.

    Apologies

    Sorry I haven't been posting the past day or so, folks. I've been very busy with debates over at Right Thinking about the Terri Schiavo case. For anyone who hadn't heard the updates, here's the low-down.

  • A three judge panel on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals declined to consider the Schiavo family's appeal.
  • The appeal was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice Kennedy, who oversees the district of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, referred the case to the rest of the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court declined to consider the appeal.
  • There are a couple of legal options left, and Governor Bush's staff is reportedly poring over Florida's legal texts in an effort to find some legal recourse.

    The situation is very unfortunate, but for a number of reasons, I think this outcome is appropriate. I'd feel a lot better if the method of death were something other than what it is. Even though I don't believe that Terri Schiavo has the capacity to suffer, it's certainly a very heart-wrenching deterioration for her family to observe.

    If you have further comments, post them. I'll try to do a news roundup tonight from work.
  • 23 March 2005

    The Traits of an Engineer

    He's the transcript of part of an AIM conversation I'm currently having with Friar Dave.

    SuperFly: I'm just saying that our library is pretty useless for history, or at least, it could be a lot better. It's geared toward science and engineering.
    FriarDave: yeah
    FriarDave: purdues pretty much the same
    FriarDave: they're engineer-crazy around here
    SuperFly: Engineers are kind of like locusts around here.
    FriarDave: haha
    FriarDave: yeah
    FriarDave: among other things
    SuperFly: They've got big bug eyes and wings, and they're obsessed with eating, mating, and destroying crops.
    FriarDave: lol
    FriarDave: thats really funny

    Alright, get back to work, wankers.

    Following Manda's Lead

    Following Manda's lead from yesterday, I thought I'd post this dose of cuteness. I see lambs like these (a bit whiter, but I can't get a decent image of little white lambs) on my way to school every day, and I've come to the conclusions that lambs are almost as cute as they are delicious.

    Fun from Bane

    Apparently I've made Bane jealous by saying that Lycan is my new hero. As if Bane could ever be replaced. Anyway, in ROTC-land they say that plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery. Hopefully pointing out a couple of Bane's recent examples of excellence will calm him down before he tracks me down and destroys me.

    First, there's this classic. I hadn't seen it in a couple of years, but it's absolutely worth reading. Who's got it? Bane's got it.

    He also posted this absolute gem: Longmire does Romance Novels. Some savage who calls himself Longmire has photoshopped the covers of a bunch of romance novels. The result? Sheer hilarity, hilariosity, and everything in between.

    If you're not reading Bane's rants, you should be.

    Fast Cars

    Don't you worry about your mind; you should worry about the day that the pain, it goes away.

    You know, I miss mine sometimes...

    And all I want is a picture of you; all I want is to get right next to you. All I want is your picture in a locket, your face in my pocket, I take a pill to stop it...

    I know these fast cars will do me no good.

    - Paul Hewson

    Tora Bora Update

    You wouldn't know it from the amount of whining in the international community and from American hippies, but we're actually detaining terrorists at Gitmo, and sometimes they give us intelligence gold.

    I'm glad this news has come out today, and not last November. It would have given Senator Kerry another excuse to claim that "when the Army had Usama bin Laden cornered at Tora Bora, this President outsourced the job to Afghan war lords, who let him escape." It wasn't really true then, and it's not really true now. And that's why John Kerry is still a senator.

    22 March 2005

    Submitted

    Well, those of you who follow The Fly (that's me) will know by now of my application for a job with a particular agency. I've completed an online writing exercise; all of my stuff is submitted, and that means that, hopefully, I'll hear some news within the next couple of weeks. Whether it's good news (a conditional offer of employment and subsequent trip to the nation's capital) or bad news (a declined application), I can at least be happy with most of what I've submitted so far.

    Anyway, I'm going to head home and get some food before work tonight. Catch y'all on the flipside. Oh, and if the news wasn't enough for you to look at, check this nonsense out. Apparently Islamofascist terrorism and the decline in Islamic creativity can be directly attributed to Zionism and American oil interests. The guy even has the balls to say that there was a post-Soviet "grand Arab alliance" engineered by Israel and the United States, and Iraq was bombed back to the stone age because it chose to break ranks. It is, of course, interesting to note that Gulf War I occurred before the collapse of the Soviet Union... But who's counting?

    For Poosh

    This is the thread where Poosh will (hopefully) post his question to me, then I'll do an update and give him an explanation.

    Bulgarian Pull-Out

    The Bulgarian Defence Minister, Nikolay Svinarov, has said that he opposes a staged pullout of Bulgarian troops from Iraq, and wants them withdrawn together by the end of 2005.

    I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with the staged pullout opinion. Staged pullouts are a good thing.

    The Soft Green Glow

    A conference in Paris has determined that nuclear power is the answer to growing demands for energy and renewable fuel.

    Tell me something I didn't know.

    Kyrgyzstan Update

    Here are a few links to updates on the demand for freedom and democracy in Kyrgyzstan.

  • BBC - "Kyrgyzstan leader blasts 'coup bid'"
  • CNN - "Kyrgyzstan: 'No emergency powers'"
  • Fox - "Gov't, Opposition Keep Order in Kyrgyzstan"

    We may have another Ukraine on our hands.
  • Dedicated

    This link is dedicated to Lee, the most outspoken advocate of almighty science I've ever seen.

    Filthy Pig

    I don't know if any of you saw this story before, but there was an eight hundred pound pig, and it wasn't Michael Moore.

    Whinin' China

    Apparently the Chinese are unhappy that the European is reconsidering the possibility of lifting the arms embargo on account of recent aggressive legislation against Taiwanese "secession."

    UPDATE: Once again, President Chirac tries to have it both ways.

    French President Jacques Chirac said that lifting an EU arms ban on China "does not mean selling arms" to Beijing, in an interview with the Japanese daily Asahi Shimbun released Tuesday.

    "I want to reassure the Japanese who have expressed concerns," he told the newpaper, according to the transcript of the interview released to reporters accompanying Chirac at European Union (EU) summit in Brussels.

    "Lifting the embargo does not mean selling arms. Europeans have no intention of commiting themselves to a policy of arms exports to China," he said, adding: "Neither does lifting the embargo mean ending arms export controls."

    The EU arms sales ban was slapped on Beijing after 1989 massacre of pro-democracy students in Beijing, but France has led a group of EU countries arguing that it is outdates and should be lifted.

    Well, let's see here. Has China initiated a policy to promote democracy? No. Has China's human rights record improved since 1989? No. And we're supposed to think that the embargo is oudated?

    And what's this absolute nonsense about not selling weapons to China? "We want to lift the ban, but we're not going to sell weapons to them. You know, not like we did for Iraq in the '90's." Who does Jacques Chirac think he's fooling? It reminds me of a prominent American politician who smoked cannabis, but didn't inhale.

    Ultimate Irony

    The Germans and the French have been bold in their efforts to commandeer and steer the European Union. Wouldn't it be ironic if the French voters rejected the E.U. constitution?

    An Olive Branch?

    The Arab League is pledging to normalize relations with Israel if the Israelis withdraw from all "occupied" territory.

    Arab leaders are expected to renew an offer to normalise relations with Israel, if it withdraws from all occupied land.

    On the opening day of the Arab League summit in Algiers, President Abdelaziz Bouteflika called for the UN to issue a definition of terrorism.

    He said only then could "an alliance between civilisations" be agreed that would protect all sides from terrorism. Only 13 of the 22 Arab leaders are attending the two-day summit.

    Now, there are a couple of things worth pointing out on this one. First, it's encouraging that the Arab League has ratched down the rhetoric. The Israelis are the rightful heirs to the "occupied" lands, but the ship has sailed on that issue; if there's going to be peace, Israel is going to have to continue ceding the appropriate "Palestinian" lands: the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in particular. There's also the issue of Jerusalem... Yeah, I'm not going to go into Jerusalem right now.

    The Israelis have rights on this issue, though. The Knessit and Prime Minister Sharon should set several conditions for the withdrawal, which they've done already, at least to a degree. The "Palestinian" territories must not be used as a safe haven for and a launching point for terrorism; President Abbas is already making a concerted effort to comply with this. Also, the Arab League must be made to formally and unequivocally recognize the right of Israel to exist, and to exist in the territories allocated for the Jews following World War II.

    Basically, concessions need to be made on both sides of the fence. Even so, the Bush Administration's unequivocal policy of promoting freedom in the Middle East, coupled with the death of Yasser Arafat (terrorist), have resulted in an unprecedented opportunity to bring peace to the Middle East. We're seeing the dividends of these developments and policies today.

    UPDATE: Here's another blurb from the AFP.

    21 March 2005

    Spring Break? Yeah Right!

    Here's the scoop, folks.

    The big news today is that Congress and President Bush have federalized the legal proceedings in the Schiavo case, thus demonstrating that ten independent, consecutive Florida state legal proceedings aren't important enough to leave a state's rights intact. I've made my point in a previous post, though watching the extensive Fox News coverage has brought more information to light. I'd heard rumblings that Mrs. Schiavo has no cerebral cortex, and that was confirmed today; apparently her condition caused her cerebral cortex to liquefy more than a decade ago. Whoever the talking head was, they said that it means she is not conscious and feels nothing; it also reiterates the fact that there is no hope whatsoever of her making a recovery. It's still an unfortunate situation, but I stand by my earlier statement: based on what I, a university student on the other side of the country, have heard, I think it's time for her blood relatives to let her go.

    I'm in the lab once again, listening to the last parts (twenty-five through thirty of thirty) of the Quran. Once I've finished it and gotten my notes turned in, I'll be doing an online writing exercise as part of my job application process. Basically, I don't have time to go through the news just yet, though I'll try to do a roundup tonight.

    Bored? Go download some Nintendo games or watch some funny video clips. Want to read something? Go read about why people who doubt that the moon landing ever happened are ignorant stooges.

    More later.

    Just a Thought

    Why in the sweet name of glaven is Liar, Liar on the Sci-Fi Channel? It's like I'm in bizarro world.

    A Psalm of Drosophilus

    You allow me to rise up; you permit my ascendance
    You stand alongside me, and watch me as I grow in pride
    Watching me, waiting, observing as I become consumed with myself
    You give me the desires of my heart

    In my hubris, you allow me to walk into my own defeat
    You watch and wait as those things most precious to me
    Are swept away, as a flood sweeps away a house of planks
    You strike me down; You bring me low

    I am altered; like a silver mirror, I am a shattered man
    You allow my enemies to pursue and harangue me
    Though they harass and intimidate me, my faith remains
    My fatigue overcomes my core, but my spirit endures

    And because I refuse to forsake You and myself, I receive my reward
    And that reward is to be struck deaf and dumb
    You blind me with your brilliance, you appear in my path
    And you refine the broken pieces into something greater than before

    20 March 2005

    Help Wanted

    Okay, so I installed HaloScan on Thus Saith The Fly last week. I like it so far, it works for me, but I have a couple of issues so far.

  • I don't know how to make HaloScan commenting available within a post.
  • I don't know how to decrease the size of the HaloScan comments link to make it match the original template appearance.
  • I would love to change the color of the background in the HaloScan window; Bane's got red, I'd love to have a black or a blue or something.

    I know of several folks who may be able to help me with this problem, but at this point I'll let them come to me. (I hope.) If you're able to help me with these issues, please get a hold of me, either in comments or by E-Mail.
  • Upgrading

    There are two blogs that have come to my most excellent attention lately, and I'm upgrading them from "worth plugging" to "Buddy Blogroll."

    The first is Eyerocker, a Southern redneck huckster. If you loved Jeff Foxworthy, you'll love Eyerocker.

    The second is Lycan Thrope. This guy is as much a savage brute as me, and he's funny as hell. Not only is he even smoother than me, but he's cultured enough to pull off a line like this:

    Of course I square away on two of them, which ultimately turns out to be a mistake. Trapped between them both and getting equal levels of interest, it becomes impossible to seperate one from the other, or properly interpret which one is more interested... So while I am in between the Scylla and Charybdis, my other buddy is chatting up the third one....

    For you savages who have no clue what he's talking about, here's an explanatory link.

    I may have to follow the lead of the Heir to the Throne and establish a ratings heirarchy for plugging other people's sites. (The Heir's heirarchy deals with levels of liberal idiocy.)

    British Common Sense

    Finally, there's some common sense with respect to the proposed lifting of the arms embargo against China by the European Union. And it's no surprise that it's coming from the United Kingdom.

    British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Sunday that China's recent adoption of an anti-secession law regarding Taiwan has complicated the lifting of the European Union's arms embargo against Beijing.

    The law has "created quite a difficult political environment," Straw told the British ITV television channel.

    The Chinese parliament last Monday approved a anti-secession law that calls for the use of force if Taiwan declares its independence from mainland China. Beijing considers the island as an inalienable part of Chinese territory.

    "Politically there are problems and these problems have actually got more difficult rather than less difficult, not least because there hasn't been much movement by China in respect of human rights," Straw said.

    Now, I'm not very optimistic about this in the long run, because the very fact that the Brits are talking about doing this along with the French is a bad sign. However, Mr. Straw's comments are spot-on. China puts on a happy face and pushes all of the human rights abuses under the rug in order to woo the European Union. The European Union takes the bait, and China responds by passing "anti-secession legislation" against Taiwan. The whole thing's ridiculous, but at least the Brits are willing to come out and say so.

    Secret Engineering Mullahs

    According to an unnamed "Western intelligence source", the mullahs are planning to establish a nuclear engineering facility within the next year.

    Circumventing Taiwanese Hippies

    A group of "conservationists" (read: hippies) protested the installation of a new nuclear reactor in Taiwan. So what did the folks in charge do? They did what any responsible company or government would do when faced with the same obstacle: they did it anyway. Good for them.

    What a Riot!

    There's been a pro-democracy riot in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.

    BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan (AP) -- At least 10,000 pro-democracy protesters stormed a police station and occupied several state buildings in Kyrgyzstan on Sunday, a government spokesman said, in the biggest demonstration since allegedly fraudulent elections last month.

    The government said it was ready to negotiate with the protesters who have demanded President Askar Akayev's resignation.

    "We hope there will be no further violence," presidential aide Abdil Seghizbayev said.

    Opposition leader Kurmanbek Bakiyev said talks would only be possible if Akayev himself sits down at the negotiating table.

    "All other lower level negotiations will be just a waste of time," he said.

    How dare the United States fight communism, dictatorships, and state sponsors of terrorism! How dare we support Viktor Yushchenko! People around the world might actually start thinking that their governments exist to work for them, and that the governments exist solely because the people give them the power to do so!

    Criticizing European Myopia

    Secretary of State Rice has warned Europe that selling sophisticated weapons to China is a bad idea.

    BEIJING — Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice suggested Sunday that European governments are irresponsible if they sell sophisticated weaponry to China that might one day be used against U.S. forces in the Pacific.

    "It is the United States, not Europe, that is defending the Pacific," Rice said. She spoke in Seoul, the penultimate stop on her weeklong tour of Asia.

    South Korea, Japan and the United States are all Pacific powers and all contribute resources to keep the Asia-Pacific region stable, Rice said.

    The European Union may soon lift an arms embargo on China (search) that was imposed after the deadly 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Tiananmen Square. Lifting the embargo would allow sale of technology and weapons that China badly wants to modernize its creaky military. China has recently gone on a military spending spree that Rice said concerns the United States.

    "The European Union should do nothing to contribute," to the possibility that Chinese forces might turn European technology on Americans, Rice said after meetings with the South Korean president and foreign minister

    Dr. Rice is absolutely correct. China's rights record hasn't improved at all since Tiananmen Square, and their recent rhetoric and posturing has been very worrisome, particularly with relation to their crack down on democracy in Macau and Hong Kong and their charged rhetoric towards the legitimate Chinese government in Taiwan.

    Europe doesn't do jack when it comes to the Pacific, so lifting the arms embargoes in order to get a short term flow of cash out of the Chinese is not only ignorant, but completely self-absorbed. This doesn't surprise me from the French, but I'd think that the Brits would have a bit more sense. Anyway, if the European nations have no remaining stake in Asian/Pacific security, they have a responsibility not to alter the balance of power. Then again, expecting help from the French government on anything isn't much different than asking a wolf to watch your sheep for a few minutes.

    Oil Prices: Here to Stay?

    According to the head of the International Monetary Fund, the high oil prices we've been dealing with for the better part of a year are here to stay, at least for a couple of years.

    I'm skeptical of this myself. I think greater efforts from the international community to help the Nigerians settle their disputes, as well as pressure against the rising tide of anti-international sentiment in Venezuela, could easily drop oil prices; not to mention the increased production from Iraq now that Oil-for-Food and sanctions have disappeared.

    The irony, though, is that Gulf War II was all about oil, right? Right!? Oh, yeah, I forgot, it wasn't about oil at all.

    Reforming the Useless Nations

    Fox News has a good article on some reforms to the United Nations that Secretary General Kofi Annan is expected to propose on Monday. There are several things worth noting.

    The blueprint for reform, according to a draft copy obtained by The Times, also proposes ways to keep the U.N. the primary setting for global security decisions and the key player in international development issues.

    The United Nations has pretty much failed in almost every attempt to make legitimate global security decisions, and its "international development" schemes have been pretty much worthless. These are issues that aren't going to be solved by restructuring the United Nations. When you have the puppets of dictators and communists sitting on both the General Assembly and the Security Council, there is no chance for legitimate "international development" or global security decisions.

    In an attempt to put the U.N. at the center of security policy, the report calls for a comprehensive anti-terrorism convention by September 2006, new measures to stem nuclear proliferation and an agreement on rules for the use of force and preemptive action, the Times said.

    First and foremost, it's worth noting that the last item, "an agreement on rules for the use of force and preemptive action", will never happen. Iraq was in blatant violation of seventeen Security Council resolutions for more than twelve years, and the Security Council couldn't even agree to hold them accountable for it. Why should I expect that the General Assembly would be able to agree on this? The United Nations has unable to give an official definition of terrorism; why should I expect that they can have an effective terrorism convention? This is ridiculous.

    The proposal is also in part an appeal to the United States not to forsake the U.N. but rather to help guide the reform. "In today's world, no state, however powerful, can protect itself on its own," it quoted Annan as saying.

    Which is to say that no other country can protect itself without the help of the United States. We develop purely defensive systems, we're condemned. We develop offensive systems, we're criticized. We do the jobs of the United Nations when they prove that they can't do it themselves, and we're chastized. And now Secretary General Annan expects us to believe that the United States needs the United Nations? Riiiiiight.

    [R]ather than establish criteria to exclude [human rights] violator nations from the council, he gently suggests that they have no place on [the new Human Rights Council]. "Those elected to the council should undertake to abide by the highest human rights standards," the Times quoted the report as saying.

    The current process of selecting members from regional groups has given seats on the 53-member commission to countries with questionable human rights records, such as Sudan, Libya and Cuba, making it a lightning rod for criticism, even from supporters of the U.N.

    The nations that get rotated into seats on the current Human Rights Commission have no problem denying suffrage to their citizens, oppressing women and minorities, jailing dissidents, et cetera; then they condemn the United States and Israel for minor, completely subjective "offenses" while giving a free pass to major human rights violators like China, Iran, North Korea, et cetera. Then liberals get all bent out of shape when conservatives call the Commission, and the other broken parts of the U.N., illegitimate and corrupt. Short of putting down specific and realistic requirements for this "Council", such changes will do nothing to improve that body's legitimacy.

    On another attention-getting topic, Annan says expansion of the Security Council must occur but he takes no stand on two competing proposals, according to the Times.

    Annan wants to enlarge the 15-member council to better reflect current realities and involve more countries who contribute financially, militarily and diplomatically to the United Nations. Both proposals would increase the membership from 15 to 24 but differ on the number of permanent and elected members.

    As far as I'm concerned, there's really no need to expand the Security Council, though there's a very real need to restructure it. First and foremost, France needs to lose its veto. It didn't deserve it when it received it, and it sure as hell doesn't now, in spite of President Chirac's efforts to restore French prestige and power in the international community. If I were redesigning the Security Council, well... I'd have to think more about it. Suffice to say, the structure would be quite different. Perhaps I'll post on that later.

    The point is that making a few structural changes to the United Nations won't solve the problems. The corruption stems from the fact that the leadership of the U.N. is nothing more than a gentleman's club where illegal and unethical practices are ignored by people who don't want to be responsible for taking their friends and colleagues to task. The General Assembly can't get anything done because it's populated by dictators, communists, and state sponsors of terrorism. The Security Council can't get anything done because the French are more interested in increasing their prestige and serving as a foil to zee Amerrrrican swine than they are in enforcing international justice and security (oh, and the whole Oil-for-Food corruption thing doesn't help either).

    The United Nations is broken because its mandate relies on humanity's greatest virtues, while its operations are control by the world's more horrible tyrannies. For Secretary General Kofi Annan to believe that these diametric opposites can be reconciled by a few procedural modifications is the height of hubris and ignorance.

    The Future Ends Here

    John DeLorean has died at the age of eighty. For those of you who have no clue who I'm talking about, this is the guy who designed the car that Christopher Lloyd turned into a time machine in the classic Back to the Future films.

    One of the things I found most interesting about the article was in this paragraph.

    Although he was a rising if unconventional executive at GM, and was believed by many to be destined for its presidency, he quit in 1973 to launch the DeLorean Motor Car Co. in Northern Ireland.


    So the guy leaves detroit and starts a car company in Northern Ireland? I'd be interested to know more about that decision.

    Intervention

    I've not commented on the Terri Schiavo case, but I've commented on a couple of message boards, and I saw this article about the Congress preparing to intervene, thus violating the sovereignty of the State of Florida.

    I think that the situation with Mrs. Schiavo is obviously very unfortunate. I also think that it is time for her parents to let her go. Mrs. Schiavo has been a vegetable for more than half of my life. She has made no discernible recovery. As far as I'm concerned, Mrs. Schiavo died about fifteen years ago; her body just hasn't caught on yet.

    We have the addtional issue of Florida law. Mrs. Schiavo's family has taken her husband through every possible legal proceeding, and Mr. Schiavo has won on every single occasion. As her husband, he has the right to make medical decisions for her, and that right has already been suspended for fifteen years. Now Congress is getting involved in an issue that has already been determined by legitimate due process. Nevermind the fact that this isn't an interstate issue (interstate issues being the jurisdiction of the federal government).

    If Congress intervenes to "save" a woman who has no legitimate hope of recovery, in the interest of "protecting life", I will be very disappointed. I think those who compare this to the issue of abortion (which I am absolutely against) or euthenasia (which I am absolutely against) are no different than those who compare "gay rights" to the Civil Rights Movement. I think the comparisons are ridiculous.

    Anyway, the point of this all is that I think Mrs. Schiavo's parents should accept the fact that their daughter is not going to recover, and recognize that there is no redemption in keeping the empty shell of her body functional indefinitely.

    Think I'm right? Think I'm wrong? Weigh in.

    Wasting Time

    Today, around the world, a bunch of people who don't read the news pissed away their time by protesting a war that has had immense benefits to both Iraq and the neighboring region.

    I saw a few of them in College City after I'd finished at the commissioning ceremony, where I saw three young men pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States by smiting America's enemies. Just looking at them, you know that if asked what their "profession" is, half of them would say "activist", and of the rest wouldn't have real jobs, either.

    I suppose my philosophy on the subject is that my efforts, past and present, though they may be few and far between, to give those folks the right to protest to their hearts' content gives me justification to acknowledge that they're a bunch of ignorant twits who buy into whatever the Big Giant Hippy Head tells them. They have no clue how the real world works, they never will, and I have no qualms about determining domestic and foreign policy without consulting with them.

    Anyway. Spooks isn't on tonight, so I'm actually going to bed now. G'night, folks.

    Ode to Leon Phelps

    Italian archaeologists have found a Bronze Age perfume factory on Cyprus.

    Rampage Gets Hitched

    Wow. What a day.

    I didn't think we were going to make it. I don't know how, but we got hopelessly lost. Within the span of five minutes, we went from "We're hopelessly lost and we're going to miss the wedding" to "Yeah, okay, you can be my wife." It was a very short ceremony, and we missed less than half of it.

    The reception was wonderful, with prime rib (three pieces, baby!) and an open bar for everything but hard alcohol. I think I had three glasses of red wine, but it may have been four. If I'm not careful, I'm going to turn into Sandal Man, who's a wine nut.

    I hadn't seen Rampage since June, though I got to talk to him a couple of times when I was in England last Summer. It was great to finally see him, and to know that within a week and a half, he won't be nearly as busy, and he'll be living nearer than he has for the last nine months.

    Anyway... Yeah. So except for the two things I need to complete and turn in on Monday, Winter Term is over. Good friggin' riddance. The Real World can't be anywhere near as much of a nightmare as the last term has been.

    Anyway, I'll try to do a couple of updates tomorrow; tonight, I'm too beat. I'll stay up long enough to at least get the tape rolling on this week's episode of Spooks, but I'll be amazed if I make it through.

    G'night, wankers.

    19 March 2005

    Stranger than Fiction

    After work tonight I went to the first of two weddings for this weekend. My friend Kelly, who I've done some theological study and discussion with (mostly during the last year, but it all started when we were fifteen) got married today, and the reception was tonight. Her sisters were there, two of whom I went to high school with, so I had someone to talk to. As a matter of fact, I hit it off with Mandy's husband, Rob. He works as a manager at a Starbucks franchise (my estimation is that he's more than just the schmuck who makes your overpriced cup of coffee).

    Anyway, the highlight of the evening? I caught the garter. But wait, there's more!

    There were two of us out on the floor. There were a good twelve or fifteen girls for the bouquet, but only two of us for the garter, and Kelly specifically summoned me. I think the groom actually aimed the thing at me. It landed at my feet, and I leaned down and picked it up.

    Oh, and the clincher? Two words: Mormon wedding.

    We'll see if I catch Mrs. Rampage's garter tomorrow; somehow, I think there will be more single guys, but we'll see.

    18 March 2005

    Early Afternoon Plugs

    I feel like I've been in this computer lab listening to the Quran for about a week, but it's only been five hours. That's right, folks. Five friggin' hours.

    Anyway, I was checking out some of Bane's rants and he linked to this crazy brute named Lycan. The guy's hilarious, and probably every bit as honest as Bane is in his posts. You'll laugh, you'll cry, you'll laugh until you cry, and then you stop.

    Also, Kingdom of Idiots is well worth the visit, as is Eyerocker.

    When you're done with that, the rest of you wankers (Manda, Wife, Sip, I'm lookin' at y'all) can answer the question below, "Search for Meaning". I'd link to it, but I haven't had a chance to get the HaloScan system completely set up, and I want the comments to be consolidated. Go find it, it's not that far down.